By Brian Sirois
April 5, 2012
"Lest Satan should get an advantage of us: for we are not ignorant of his devices." --2 Corinthians 2:11
We are building a Bridge to Babylon with all this confusion!
"My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge:
because thou hast rejected knowledge,
I will also reject thee, that thou shalt be no priest to me:
seeing thou hast forgotten the law of thy God,
I will also forget thy children" -- Hosea 4:6.
"Now the Spirit speaketh expressly, that in the latter times some shall depart from the faith,
giving heed to seducing spirits, and DOCTRINES OF DEVILS;" -- I Timothy 4:1
"Let us hear the conclusion of the whole matter: Fear God, and keep his commandments: for this is the whole duty of man." -- Ecclesiastes 12:13
"Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth." -- 2 Timothy 2:15
If God is NOT the author of confusion, then why do we have over 400 different Bible version in english now? And why do we have "New Age" terminology and phraseology like "As Above So Below" in the "Message Bible" in the LORD's prayer? And why do we have people like Rupert Murdoch that own the rights to the NIV? And Why do we have people like Virginia Mollenkott, Kurt Aland, Bruce Metzger, and "Jesuit" priest Carlo M. Martini, just to name a few, involded in Bible translations? OR People like Westcott and Hort in charge of putting together new Greek manuscripts?
And why do we see stuff like this:
Total Words in KJV....790,704
Total Words in NIV.....726,606
A Difference of............ 64,098
(Including Additions & Deletions)
In an NIV, for every 11.34 words in the text there is one word missing!
Here is a good quote about this issue:
"When I was a young preacher, the battle was over how to interpret the Bible. Now, almost half a century later, the battle is over the Bible itself. Then, the battle was over what the Bible TAUGHT. Today the battle is over what the Bible IS. Then, it was a battle over interpretation. Now, it is a battle over inspiration and preservation. Then, it was a battl...e over difference of doctrine. Now, it is a battle over where we get our doctrine. Then, it was a battle over the flow. Now, it is a battle over the source. Then, it was a battle over what Truth says. Now the battle is over what truth is." -- Jack Hyles (I do not endorse Hyles, but this quote is the truth)
In this THESIS, I will show you stuff that is BEYOND BLASPHEMY; and the beliefs, activities, and fruit of the men behind these new manuscripts and new Bible PERversions. I will show and prove that this is designed to build a direct BRIDGE TO BABYLON via the New Age Movement and New Age Bible PERversions to build a ecumenical one world church that is back under the antichrist church of ROME! This has been the Jesuit plot since day one. I will even show Madame Helena Petrovna Blavatsky hand in all the Bible versions and her connections to Westcott and Hort.
I will give you irrefutable proof backed by 100% FACTS of the Devil's hand in every sinlge Bible version since 1881!
PART 1 -- The attitude of the people behind the new modern Bible PERversions with NO FEAR of the word of God:
This is the attitude: "I felt bound to abandon the God-dictated-ever-word-from-cover-to-cover attitude."- J.B Phillips, Editor of the Phillips Bible.
"This is the sole instance of the translators departing from the accepted text. He felt bound to conclude, from the sense of the next three verses, that we have here either a slip of the pen on the part of Paul, or, more probably, a copyist's error." (J.B. Phillips Bible, Page 552, Note 5.)
Written by a Bible perverter and Bible corrector; this mentality is APPALLING, no reverance for the word of God!
"The Bible is the 'words of men' a 'literany production.'"- Ronald Youngblood, NIV Committee.
"There are mistakes in the transmission of texts."-Burton Goddard of the NIV Committee.
"Ever member of the panel was conscious that some of its decisions were in no sense certain" - NEB Committee.
Rob Lacey's Bible "The Word on the Street" by Zondervan; in the upgrades sections of his Bible, he says:
"Call it nerve, call it passion to connect, call it poetic licence, whatever. The main questions is, 'Do the words get in the way of the stroy?' If so, either change'em or insist everyone goes to evening classes on religious speak." END-QUOTE.
Nevermind the warnings in Revenlation 22??! God will curse those who change His Word. "For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book: And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book." (Revelation 22:18-19)
God said, "Therefore, behold, I am against the prophets, saith the LORD, that steal my words every one from his neighbour." -- Jeremiah 23:30 God goes on to say, "... for ye have perverted the words of the living God, of the LORD of hosts our God." -- Jeremiah 23:36.
PART 2 -- QUICK HISTORY:
PART 2 -- QUICK HISTORY:
In the year 1516 A.D. a man named Desiderius Erasmus restored the TRUE Greek Text to Europe from Antioch Syria once he read the Antioch Greek Manuscript. He seen how corrupt Jerome's latin vulgate was and made a whole new translation of the Greek into Latin with the Greek next to it.
Two men made translations from this text into the languages of their people. Martin Luther in Germany with his German Bible, for the German speaking people. And William Tyndale in England, for the english speaking people. Both men had to disobey the laws of the Roman Catholic Church to make their translations.
The Bible that William Tyndale began would eventualy become the greatest book in the history of the world (The King James bible)!
In 1526 A.D. one evening William Tyndale was having a discussion with a Catholic Bishop on the AUTHORITY of Scripture. The Catholic Bishop said he respected the word of the Pope more then the Bible.
Tyndale's months of study, prayer and contemplation erupted in one passionate reply, "I defy the pope and all his laws; if God spare my life ere many years, I will cause a boy that driveth the plough, shall know more of the Scripture then thou dost."
Tyndales desire was to make the Bible available in english instead of the latin bibles used by the Roman Catholic clergy that was used to keep the people in bondage!
In 1534 A.D. he translated the NT into english from the Greek Text of Erasmus. In 1536 A.D. William Tyndale was excuted and burnt at the stake by the Roman Catholic Church. His crime, giving the people of England the word of God in their own language. The tyrantical antichrist church of Rome could not have there authority undermined by a english Bible. William Tyndale had to be killed, if the pope wanted to remain in control of the people of England.
William Tyndale's dieing words were, "LORD open the king of Englands eyes."
His prayer was answered; In the year of 1604, King James the 1st of England AUTHORIZED a translation of the Holy Bible into the English language. 54 of Europes best scholars were tasked for this, of the 54 only 47 would partake in this monimental task which would take "7" years to complete (1604 -1611).
From Terence H. Brown, (Secretary of the Trinitarian Bible Society, London, England) comes this description of Westminster committee member Lancelot Andrewes:
He "... had his early education at Coopers Free School and Merchant Taylors School, where his rapid progress in the study of the ancient languages was brought to the notice of Dr. Watts, the founder of some scholarships at Pembroke Hall, Cambridge. Andrewes was sent to that College, where he took his B.A. degree and soon afterward was elected Fellow. He then took his Master's degree and began to study divinity and achieved great distinction as a lecturer. He was raised to several positions of influence in the Church of England and distinguished himself as a diligent and excellent preacher, and became Chaplain to Queen Elizabeth I. King James I promoted him to be Bishop of Chester in 1605 and also gave him the influential position of Lord Almoner. He later became Bishop of Ely and Privy Counsellor. Toward the end of his life he was made Bishop of Winchester.
"It is recorded that Andrewes was a man of deep piety and that King James had such great respect for him that in his presence he refrained from the levity in which he indulged at other times. A sermon preached at Andrewes' funeral in 1626 paid tribute to his great scholarship:
'His knowledge in Latin, Greek, Hebrew, Chaldee, Syriac and Arabic, besides fifteen modern languages was so advanced that he may be ranked as one of the rarest linguists in Christendom. A great part of five hours every day he spent in prayer, and in his last illness he spent all his time in prayer -- and when both voice and eyes and hands failed in their office, his countenance showed that he still prayed and praised God in his heart, until it pleased God to receive his blessed soul to Himself.'"
John Bois (sometimes spelled Boys) (January 3, 1560 -January 14, 1643) is remembered mainly as one of the members of the translating committee for the Authorized Version of the Bible.
Bois was born in Nettlestead, Suffolk, England, His father was William Bois, his mother was Mirable Poolye. His father took great care about his education, and already at the age of five years John he had read the Bible in Hebrew. He was sent to school at Hadley, then went to St John's College, Cambridge, in 1575 when he was 15 years old. He soon was proficient in Greek.
In 1580 John Bois (not to be confused with John Boys, Dean of Canterbury from 1619-1625) was elected Fellow of his College. He lectured on Greek and began to study medicine, but soon quit the study, instead he turned to divinity. On June 21, 1583 he was ordained a deacon of the Church of England. For ten years, he was Greek lecturer in his college.When he was about thirty-six years old, on October 13, 1596, he married the daughter of the rector at Boxworth and after the death of her father he took over this post. He assisted Henry Savile with the translation of the works of John Chrysostom.
In 1604 he was recruited for one of the Cambridge committees set up to translate the Bible into English. He first served in the "Cambridge Company" charged by James I of England with translating the Apocrypha for the King James Version of the Bible and later assisted the Cambridge company that translated 1 Chronicles to Song of Solomon. Six years later, when the work was done, the work was reviewed by six or twelve scholars before the final publication. Bois was one of their number. After the final editing by Miles Smith and Thomas Bilson, the Bible was then published in 1611.
In 1609 he succeeded fellow translator John Duport as prebendary of Ely while also serving as rector of Boxworth. He spent the last years of his life there. He was eighty-three when he died in Ely. He had four sons and three daughters, none of whom survived their father. His wife died two years before him.
The reference work The Dictionary of National Biography noted that John Bois wrote a manuscript that "consists of brief critical notes, in which the renderings of the Vulgate are in the main defended, but Bois frequently proposes more exact translations of his own, both Latin and English" (p. 775). John M'Clintock and James Strong noted that Bois' only published work was "a vindication of the Vulgate version of the New Testament" (Cyclopaedia of Biblical, Theological, and Ecclesiastical, Literature, Vol. I, p. 869).
These men were set up in 6 groups; 2 at Cambridge, 2 at Westminster and 2 at Oxford. They would use the Text that would become known as the Textus Receptus (Latin: "received text"). And would complete THE BOOK, that would become the greatest Book of ALL TIME!
William Tyndale's dieing words to God had been answered!
PART 3 -- THE JESUITS:
As oppostion to the catholic church grew, the pope became desprate for a solution to his Protestant problem! In 1534, a man named Ignatius Loyola founded a radical society of catholics whos purpose was to fight against the Protestant Reformers.
On september 27th, 1540, Pope Paul the III formaly estableshed the Jesuits as a offical catholic organization. Part of the Jesuit oath says,
"My son, heretofore you have been taught to act the dissembler: among Roman Catholics to be a Roman Catholic, and to be a spy even among your own brethren; to believe no man, to trust no man. Among the Reformers, to be a Reformer; among the Huguenots, to be a Huguenot; among the Calvinists, to be a Calvinist; among other Protestants, generally to be a Protestant; and obtaining their confidence, to seek even to preach from their pulpits, and to denounce with all the vehemence in your nature our Holy Religion and the Pope; and even to descend so low as to become a Jew among Jews, that you might be enabled to gather together all information for the benefit of your Order as a faithful soldier of the Pope. You have been taught to plant insidiously the seeds of jealousy and hatred between communities, provinces, states that were at peace, and to incite them to deeds of blood, involving them in war with each other, and to create revolutions and civil wars in countries that were independent and prosperous, cultivating the arts and the sciences and enjoying the blessings of peace; to take sides with the combatants and to act secretly with your brother Jesuit, who might be engaged on the other side, but openly opposed to that with which you might be connected, only that the Church might be the gainer in the end, in the conditions fixed in the treaties for peace and that the end justifies the means. You have been taught your duty as a spy, to gather all statistics, facts and information in your power from every source; to ingratiate yourself into the confidence of the family circle of Protestants and heretics of every class and character, as well as that of the merchant, the banker, the lawyer, among the schools and universities, in parliaments and legislatures, and the judiciaries and councils of state, and to be all things to all men, for the Pope's sake, whose servants we are unto death. You have received all your instructions heretofore as a novice, a neophyte, and have served as co-adjurer, confessor and priest, but you have not yet been invested with all that is necessary to command in the Army of Loyola in the service of the Pope. You must serve the proper time as the instrument and executioner as directed by your superiors; for none can command here who has not consecrated his labours with the blood of the heretic; for "without the shedding of blood no man can be saved". Therefore, to fit yourself for your work and make your own salvation sure, you will, in addition to your former oath of obedience to your order and allegiance to the Pope" END-QUOTE. (excerpt of the Jesuit Extreme Oath of Induction as recorded in the Journals of the 62nd Congress, 3rd Session, of the United States Congressional Record (House Calendar No. 397, Report No. 1523, 15 February, 1913, pp. 3215-3216)).
From 1545 to 1564 the Council of Trent met and condemed the enemies of the catholic church. In the 4th session thay stated,
"Futhermore, to check unbridle spirits, it decrees that no one relying on his won judgment shall, in matters of faith and morals pertaining to the edification of christian doctrine, distorting the Holy Scriptures in accordance with his own conceptions. Presume to interpret them contrary to that sense which holy mother church to whom it belongs to judge of their true sense and interpretation...
"...[this council] decrees and ordains that in the future the Holy Scriptures, especialy the old vulgate edition, be printed in the most correct manner possible, and that it shall not lawful for anyone to print or to have printed any books whatsoever dealing with sacred doctrinal matters without the name of the author, or in the future to sell them, or even to have them in possession, unless they have first been examined and approved by the ordinary, under penalty of anathema and fine prescribed by the last council of the Lateran."
In 1605, the Jesuits tried to assassinate King James and the members of parliament. On the morning of November the 5th, Guy Fawkes was discovered by an act of God, with 36 barrows of gun powder, which was hidden under the floor in which King James would be standing in a matter of hours. The conspirators were captured and excuted. God protected King James and the translators.
But the Jesuits had anohter plan, if the people of England wanted a Bible, then they (the Jesuits) would give them one. The Jesuit's Douay–Rheims Bible! The "Rheims" NT was released in 1582 and the whole Bible was finished in 1610, exactly one year before the Authorized Version (King James) of 1611.
Which almost all of the changes found in the newer version match that of the Jesuit's Douay–Rheims Bible from 1610!
PART 4 -- Westcott & Hort:
A) In 1871, The church of England decided that the King James Version should be revised. Two unsaved scholars, Brooke Foss Westcott and Fenton John Anthony Hort, would see to it that a whole new translation would be made to replace the King James Authorized Version.
They used mainly "4" manuscripts to make this new translations. These manuscripts used were ROMAN CATHOLIC MANUSCRIPTS!!!
Codex Sinaiticus (א)
Codex Vaticanus (B)
Codex Ephraemi Rescriptus (C)
There corrupt "Revised Version" was released in 1881.
BUT WHAT ABOUT THE BELIEFS OF WESTCOTT AND HORT???
Dr. William Grady said it best in his excellent book, Final Authority...
“Wescott and Hort, were a pair of unsaved liberals whose open Vatican sympathies cast them as the consummate Jesuit plants.”
B) In 1896, a collection of Hort's letters was published by his son in two volumes. The book entitled "Life and Letters of Fenton John Anthony Hort" by his son Arthur Fenton Hort.
In Vol. 1 on page 76 we read,
"The pure Romish view seems to me nearer, and more likely to lead to, the truth than the Evangelical;"
On page 148, Hort said,
"...the ordinary confused evangelical notions, tho' I would on no account alter the prayer book of catechism to make them more palatable to them."
On page 400, Hort admits that,
"The positive doctrines even of the evangelicals seem to me perverted rather than untrue. There are, I fear, still serious differences between us on the subject of authority, and especially the authority of the Bible,"
On page 445, Hort says,
"I have a sort of craving that our text should be cast upon the world before we deal with matters likely to brand us with suspicion. I mean, a text, issued by men already known for what will undoubtedly be treated as dangerous heresey, will have great difficulties in finding its way to regions which it might otherwise hope to reach, and whence it would not be easily banished by subsequent alarms."
Hort shows his hatred for the TRUE Greek Text on page 211, were he states,
"I had no idea till last few weeks of the importance of texts, having read so little Greek Testament, and dragged on with the villainous Textus Receptus. Westcott recommented me to get Bagster's Critical, which has Scholz's Text, and is most convenient in small quarto, with parallel Greek and English, and a wide margin on purpose for notes. This pleased me much; so many little alterations on good MS. authority made things clear not in a vulgar, notional way, but by giving a deeper and fuller meaning. But after all scholz is very capricious and sparing in intorducing good readings; and Tischendorf I find a great acquisition, above all, because he gives various readings at the bottom of his page, and his prolegomena are invaluable. Think of that vile Textus Receptus leaning entirely on late MSS; it is a blessing there are such early ones..."
In a letter to Westcott, Hort says on Page 430,
"Certainly nothing can be more unscriptural than the modern limiting of Christ's bearing our sins and suffering to His death; but indeed that is only one aspect of an almost universal heresey."
On page 120, Hort declars,
"The fact is, I do not see how God's justice can be satisfied wothout every man's suffering in his own person the full penalty for his sins. I know that it can, for if it could not in the case of some at least, the whole Bible would be a lie; but if in the case of some, why not in the case of all?"
Hort clearly did not believe that the death of Jesus on the cross was not enough to pay for his sins!!!
C) What about WESTCOTT, what did he believe???
In 1903, Westcott's son "Arthur Westcott" published his fathers letters in a two volume book entitled, "Life and Letters of Brooke Foss Westcott."
On pages 228-229, Westcott told Hort what he thought of the Textus Receptus,
"I feel most keenly the disgrace of circulating what I feel to be falsified copies of the Holy Scripture, and am most anxious to provide something to replace them."
He then went on to say on that same page,
"But pray think how utterly ignorant and prejudiced even well-informed men are on the text of the New Testament."
On page 52, Westcott said,
"I never read an account of a miracle but I seem instinctively to feel its improbability, and discover some want of evidence in the account of it."
In volume 2, on page 49 Westcott gives his view on Heaven, he writes,
"..it saves us from the error of connecting the presence of Christ's glorified humanity with place: 'heaven is a state and not a place.' I cannot therefore but think that you should require the most exact rending of the whole."
On page 394, Westcott states,
"If Tennyson's idea of heaven was true, that 'heaven is the ministry of the soul to soul,' we may reasonable hope, by patient, resolute, faithful, united endeavour, to find heaven about us here, the glory of our earthly life."
Westcott shows his love for ROMAN CATHOLICISM on page 81, when he writes,
"After leaving the monastery we shaped our course to a little oratory which we discovered on the summit of neighbouring hill, and by a little scrambling we reached it. Fortunately we found the door open. It is very small, with one kneeling--place; and behind a screen was a "Pietà" the size of life (i.e. a virgin and dead christ). The sculpture was painted, and such a group in such a place and at such a time was deeply impressive. I could not help thinking on the fallen grandeur of the Romish Church, on her zeal even in error, on her earnestness and self-devotion, which we might nobler views and a purer end, strive to imitate. Had I been alone I could have knelt there for hours."
It is truely sad that a intelligent man like Westcott could not bring him self to believe in Heaven or miracles!!
D) But Westcott and Hort was involved in something far more sinister. In 1845, they joined the "Hermes Club." In 1851, they formed the "Ghostly Guild," which was followed by the Eranus Club in 1872. These clubs were involved in the occult and in necromancy!!! Necromancy is communicating with dead spirits.
Why would two men who claimed to be saved, have such an interest in the spirit world and the occult??? Should a Christian trust a text or a Bible traced back to these two men??? Westcott and Hort's corrupt Greek Text and textual criticism theories would go on to produce over 400 new versions of the Bible in the next 120 years!!
E) Facts about Westcott and Hort:
Brooke Foss Westcott (1825-1901) and Fenton John Anthony Hort (1828-1892) were the two English "scholars" who produced the corrupt Greek text of the modern versions. Their dominating influence on the revision committee of 1871-1881 accounts for most of the corruption that we have today in modern translations. The Bible believer should keep several points in mind when discussing these two men. The following information is well documented in Final Authority, by William Grady, and in Riplinger's New Age Bible Versions, and in Les Garrett's Which Bible Can We Trust?
1. Together, the Life and Letters of Brooke Foss Westcott and the Life and Letters of Fenton John Anthony Hort run over 1,800 pages. A personal salvation testimony is not given once for either man, and the name "Jesus" is found only nine times!
2. Westcott was a firm believer in Mary worship, and Hort claimed that Mary worship had a lot in common with Jesus worship.
3. Hort believed in keeping Roman Catholic sacraments.
4. Hort believed in baptismal regeneration as taught in the Catholic church.
5. Hort rejected the infallibility of Scripture.
6. Hort took great interest in the works of Charles Darwin, while both he and Westcott rejected the literal account of Creation.
7. Westcott did not believe in the Second Coming of Christ, the Millennium, or a literal Heaven.
8. Both men rejected the doctrine of a literal Hell, and they supported prayers for the dead in purgatory.
9. Hort refused to believe in the Trinity.
10. Hort refused to believe in angels.
11. Westcott confessed that he was a communist by nature.
12. Hort confessed that he hated democracy in all it's forms.
13. Westcott also did his share of beer drinking. In fact, only twelve years after the Revised Version was published, Westcott was a spokesman for a brewery.
14. While working on their Greek text (1851-1871), and while working on the Revision Committee for the Revised Version (1871-1881), Westcott and Hort were also keeping company with "seducing spirits and doctrines of devils" (I Tim. 4:1). Both men took great interest in occult practices and clubs. They started the Hermes Club in 1845, the Ghostly Guild in 1851, and Hort joined a secret club called The Apostles in the same year. They also started the Eranus Club in 1872. These were spiritualists groups which believed in such unscriptural practices as communicating with the dead (necromancy).
15. The Westcott and Hort Greek text was SECRETLY given to the Revision Committee.
16. The members of the Revision Committee of 1881 were sworn to a pledge of secrecy in regard to the new Greek text being used, and they met in silence for ten years.
17. The corrupt Greek text of Westcott and Hort was not released to the public until just five days before the debut of the Revised Version. This prevented Bible-believing scholars like Dean Burgon from reviewing it and exposing it for the piece of trash that it was.
QUESTION: Does this sound like an HONEST work of God or a DISHONEST work of the Devil?
PART 5 -- Madame Helena Petrovna Blavatsky connections to Westcott & Hort:
H. P. Blavatsky also attended the "Ghostly Guild" meetings with Westcott and Hort, along with Charles Darwin. In her books Isis Unveiled Vol. 1 and 2, and The Secret Doctrine Vol. 1 and 2, Blavatsky says, "we have the Bible in true in Codex Sinaiticus (א) and Codex Vaticanus (B)" and goes on to say " Westcott and Hort were true scholars that corrected the errors in previous versions." Blavatsky also said that Westcott was the father of "channeling."
Now listen to this quote by her,
"Now that the 'Revised Version' of the gospels has been published by Westcott and Hort, and the most glaring mistranslations in the old version, the King James, are corrected, one will better understand the words. The text of the english protestant Bible is in disagreement as usual with the Alexandrian text. That which for nearly 1,500 years was opposed on Christianism of a book of which every word was written under direct supervision of the Holy Ghost; of which not one syllable or comma could be changed without Sacrilege, but now is being retranslated, revised and corrected and clipped of whole verses, and in some cases almost entire chapters. And as soon as the new edition is out, its doctors Westcott and Hort will have us accept it as new revelation of the 19th century. And the King James translators have made such a jumble of it, that no one but an occultist can restore the Bible to its orginal form." (H. P. Blavatsky, on the Bible, Isis Unveiled.)
Where ever we find spiritualism, occultism and Satanism, we find the infallibililty of the King James Bible decried, and the RV exalted:
"I am proud to have been one of the pioneer workers in the Spiritualistic field, and have suffered much for the cause of Spiritualism, in upholding its purity and promulgating its truth. I am writing this in defense of the glorious truth I love so well...The King James Bible is admittedly one of the most incorrect versions..." (Franklin Alonzo Thomas, Philosophy and Phenomena of Spiritalism, 1922)
Another example is H. P. Blavatsky (1831-1891); she was an early leader of the occult Theosophy movement. She founded the Theosophical Society in 1875. Blavatsky was a Satanist, who claimed to be a medium. What do these Satanically-inspired writers think about the King James Bible and the new versions??? Blavatsky's words on the subject are frighteningly close to those of many modern, conservative scholars. She called Westcott, "a learned scholar" (i.e. Isis Unveiled), and quotes him often. Statements from Blavatsky could be multiplied, such as, "...the Revised Version does not repeat the mistakes of the Authorized Version..." For example, she writes:
"In the King James's version, as it stands translated, it has no resemblance to the original." (Blavatsky, Isis Unveiled).
"Add to this the fact that out of the forty-seven translators of King James' Bible 'only three understood Hebrew' ...and one may easily understand what reliance can be placed on the English version of the bible...Now the Revised Version of the gospels has been published and most glaring mistranslations of the old versions are corrected, one will understand better the words in St. John [chapter 5:6-7]..." (Blavatsky, The Secret Doctrine, 1888)
Some of the followers of Blavatsky also claimed to be under the control of spirits through automatic writing, etc. In 1891, Annie Besant (1847-1933) succeeded Blavatsky as head of the Theosophical Society. From 1889, until Blavatsky's death in 1891, Besant was a co-editor of the Theosophical Society's "Lucifer Magazine." Besant, and her associates, hated the Kink James Bible:
"The English translation (Authorized Version--KJV) is wretchedly imperfect. Errors abound in it, and some of them are of a most laughable description. On this account great calls have been made for the new translation..." (Charles Bradlaugh, Annie Wood Besant, Charles Watts, The Freethinker's Text-book, 1876)
Later Theososphical writings continue to attack the King James Bible:
"...the English translation called the Authorized Version...while it is dear to English people...yet lacks entirely the proper spirit of the mystical Hebrew orginal; and the very fact that Englishmen love their King James's version so much distracts their attention away from the orginal Mystical sense of the Hebrew scriptures. Go then to the orginal tongue..." (Lucifer Magazine, January to December, 1930)
Another influential occult writer is Manly Palmer Hall. Notice the following short biography of this Satanic writer:
"Manly Palmer Hall [1901-1990] was a Canadian-born author and mystic. He is perhaps most famous for his work The Secret Teachings of All Ages: An Encyclopedic outline of Masonic, Hermetic, Qabbalistic and Rosicrucian Symbolocal Philosophy, which is widely regarded as his magum opus, and which he published at the age of 25 (or 27, 1928)...In 1973 (47 years after writing The Secret Teaching of All Ages), Hall was recognized as a 33 degree Mason, at a ceremony held at PRS on December 8th..." (www.manlyphall.org)
Manly P. Hall often wrote against the King James Bible. He sometimes slandered it with historical lies; but his main goal (like the earlier necromancers) was to oppose the popular view of its infallibility!:
"The King James version is especially rich in errors..." (Manly P. Hall, Reincarnation: The cycle of Necessity, 1956)
"We know that the Authorized Version by no means satisfies the requirements of advanced Biblical scholarship..." (Manly P. Hall, Horizon, Issue 9. Vol. 1, 1949)
"...we have to to undo much that is cherished error. The problem of revising the Bible shows how difficult is is to do this. For the last hundred years, we have been trying to get out an edition of the Bible that is reasonably correct; but nobody wants it. Whats wanted is the good old King James version, every jot and tittle of it, because most people are convinced that God dictated the Bible to King James in English." (Manly P. Hall, Horizon, Philosophical Research Society, 1944)
The occult plan is plainly confessed above. What book did Hall (who boasted of having the keys to channeling the power of Lucifer) call one of the great books of the world? It was one of the principle manuscripts that issued by all modern versions, and many modern scholars to supposedly "correct" the King James Bible!:
"The Codex Sinaiticus is a manuscript of the 4th Century...This manuscript is one of the great books of the world, and although it was discovered long after the publication of the now universally accepted King James version of the Bible, it is sufficiently important to justify considerable revision of our popular conception of the Scriptural writings." (Manly P. Hall, Horizon the Magazine of useful and Intelligent Living, 1946)
PART 6 -- Who is to profit:
Who would stand to profit the most if the King James Bible past out of common use?????????
On October 11th of 1962, the first session of the Vatican Council II meet in St. Peter's Basilica in Rome. Over the next few years, they plotted out the future of the Roman Catholic Church.
On November 18th, 1965, the "Dogmatic Constitution on Divine Revelation" was written. In chapter 6, on page 112, we read,
"But since the word of God must be readily available at all times, the church, with motherly concern, sees to it that suitable and correct translations are made into various languages, especially from the orginal texts of the sacred books. If, when the opportunity presents itself and the authority of the church agree, these translations are made jointly with churches separated from us, they can then be used by all Christians."
In 1989, one of the NIV Translators and creators, whos name is Burton L. Goddard, would write a book called, "The NIV Story: The Inside Story of the New International Version." He would describe the process the NIV translators would use to create there new version.
On page 96 and 97, Burton Goddard would reveal a shocking secret about the NIV,
Pg. 96, "The magic of summers in Europe is indeed getting the job done, so the pattern continues. In 1976 the scene is the Colegio Mayor Montellano, a residential unit of the University of Salamanca, fourth oldest University in Europe. An order of Catholic nuns operates the residence, and affectionare ties of Christian love soon bline the hearts of all together in a marvelous way."
What is the University of Salamanca?? it is one of the Roman Catholic's oldest Universitys; it is also one of the schools that trained "Ignatius Loyola", the founder of the JESUITS!!!
On page 97, Buton Goddar goes on to say,
"The summers in Europe make it possible for a collegiate translation to be produced within a relatively short span of time. In the process, they enrich the lives of translators and their familes in a remarkable way in areas of history, culture, and scenic beauty. But more! They provide a practical day-by-day ECUMENICAL EXPERIENCE beyond compare."
But what Greek text did the NIV use?
"What Greek text was used by the translators of the NIV New Testament? It was basically that found in the United Bible Societies' and Nestle's printed Greek New testaments," (The NIV: The Making of a Contemporary Translation, Kenneth L. Barker, Page 53).
The Nestle-Aland text was derived mainly from Westcott and Hort's Text via Codex Sinaiticus (א) and Codex Vaticanus (B).
Now lets look at some of the facts about these 2 manuscripts:
Codex B omits the following portions of scripture:
-- Genesis 1:1 through 46:28
-- Psalms 106 through 138
-- Matthew 16:2-3
-- The Pastoral Epistles
-- Hebrews 9:14 through 13:25
-- And the ENTIRE book of Revelation!
Sinaiticus and Vaticanus:
When someone "corrects" the King James Bible with "more authoritative manuscripts" or "older manuscripts," or "the best authorities," they're usually making some reference to Sinaiticus or Vaticanus. These are two very corrupt fourth century uncials that are practically worshipped by modern scholars. These are the primary manuscripts that Westcott and Hort relied so heavily on when constructing their Greek text (1851-1871) on which the new versions are based.
Vaticanus (B) is the most worshipped. This manuscript was officially catalogued in the Vatican library in 1475, and is still property of the Vatican today. Siniaticus (Aleph) was discovered in a trash can at St. Catherine's Monastery on Mt. Sinai by Count Tischendorf, a German scholar, in the year 1844. Both B and Aleph are Roman Catholic manuscripts. Remember that!
You might also familiarize yourself with the following facts:
1. Both manuscripts contain the Apocrypha as part of the Old Testament.
2. Tischendorf, who had seen both manuscripts, believed they were written by the same man, possibly Eusebius of Caesarea (260-340 A.D.).
3. Vaticanus was available to the King James translators, but God gave them sense enough to ignore it.
4. Vaticanus omits Geneses 1:1-46:28, Psalm 106-138, Matthew 16:2-3, Rom. 16:24, I Timothy through Titus, the entire book of Revelation, and it conveniently ends the book of Hebrews at Hebrews 9:14. If you're familiar with Hebrews 10, you know why.
5. While adding The Epistle of Barnabas and The Shepherd of Hermas to the New Testament, Siniaticus omits John 5:4, 8:1-11, Matthew 16:2-3, Romans 16:24, Mark 16:9-20, Acts 8:37, and I John 5:7 (just to name a few).
6. It is believed that Siniaticus has been altered by as many as ten different men. Consequently, it is a very sloppy piece of work (which is probably the reason for it being in a trash can). Many transcript errors, such as missing words and repeated sentences are found throughout it.
7. The Dutch scholar, Erasmus (1469-1536), who produced the world's first printed Greek New Testament, rejected the readings of Vaticanus and Siniaticus.
8. Vaticanus and Siniaticus not only disagree with the Majority Text from which the KJV came, they also differ from each other. In the four Gospels alone, they differ over 3,000 times!
9. When someone says that B and Aleph are the oldest available manuscripts, they are lying. There are many Syriac and Latin translations from as far back as the SECOND CENTURY that agree with the King James readings. For instance, the Pashitta (145 A.D.), and the Old Syriac (400 A.D.) both contain strong support for the King James readings. There are about fifty extant copies of the Old Latin from about 157 A.D., which is over two hundred years before Jerome was conveniently chosen by Rome to "revise" it. Then Ulfilas produced a Gothic version for Europe in A.D. 330. The Armenian Bible, which agrees with the King James, has over 1,200 extant copies and was translated by Mesrob around the year 400. Sinaiticus and Vaticanus are clearly NOT the oldest and best manuscripts.
PART 7 -- Rupert Murdoch & Virginia Mollenkott:
Pope John Paul the II knighted Rupert Murdoch into the "Order of St. Gregory the Great." Rupert Murdoch, owns "Zondervan" and the printing rights to the NIV. And you ask why is that important? Because Rupert Murdoch also owns News Corp and HarperCollins publishers, the company that has the printing rights to "The Satanic Bible" by Anton Szandor LaVey!
Virginia Mollenkott was on the translation committee for the NIV. She is a Lesbian who is is a Christian author who has advocated LGBT rights and Christian feminism. She has contributed a major study on the feminine imagery for God in the Bible, and supports the use of gender inclusive language for God. And She was on the NIV translation committee.
PART 8 -- The Nestle's Text:
What is the story behind the Nestle text?
In 1898, a man named "Eberhard Nestle" would conbine the Greek texts of Westcott and Hort, Tischendorf and Richard Francis Weymouth. Over the next 100 years, this would go through various editions and is known today as the "Nestle-Aland 27th Edition."
Now lets look at some of the people involved in creating and producing this Greek Text:
In 1952, a German named "Kurt Aland" would join the Nestle team, he would assest in producing new editions the Nestle's Greek Text, his final being the 25th edition. He would eventual be joined by his wife Barbara. He denied the verbal inspiration of the Bible and wanted to see all denominations united into one “body” by the acceptance of a new ecumenical canon of Scripture which would take into account the Catholic apocryphal books (The Problem of the New Testament Canon, pp. 6,7,30-33). To the right is Kurt Aland with the Pope.
Another man involved with Nestle's text is "Bruce M. Metzger." He was a professor at Princeton Theological Seminary and was one of the creators of the New RSV.
At his death in 2007, Princeton Theological Seminary would write:
"In 1993 Bruce Metzger presented a copy of the NRSV, catholic edition, to Pope John Paul II at the Vatican. Bruce Metzger understood and was passionate about the significance of biblical translation for ecumenical dialogue."
This article goes on to say, "In 1972 he chaired the sub-committee that translated 3rd and 4th Maccabees and Psalm 151 for expanded versions of the Aprcrypha. He personally presented this expanded version to His All Holiness Demetrios I in 1976. It was important to him that Roman Catholic, Greek Orthodox, and Protestant Christians be able to have recourse to a common biblical text as an instrument of unity."
Now lets look at another member of the Nestle team, his name is Carlo M . Martini, who is a JESUIT PRIEST!!!
On Page 45 of the Nestle-Aland 27th edition, we read:
"The text shared by these two editions was adopted internationally by Bible societies, and following an agreement between the Vatican and the United Bible Societies, it has served as the basis for new translations for revisions made under their supervision. This marks a significant step with regard to interconfessional relationships. It should naturally be understood that this text is a working text (in the sense of the century-long Nestle tradition): It is not to be considered as definitive, but as a stimulus to further efforts toward defining and verifying the text of the New Testament, for many reason, however, the present edition has not been deemed an appropriate occasion for introducing textual changes."
One can only wonder what the Jesuit Carlo Martini has planed for the next edition of the Nestle's text????
The Jesuits are the most militant arm of papal power to this day. Their goals were to reclaim those that had left Catholicism and to attack the reliability of the Textus Receptus. They would use ANY METHOD to regain control including confiscation, treachery, torture and assassination. Jesuits will stop at nothing to bring the whole world under subjection to the Vatican. The Jesuits ploy was to entice Protestants back to Rome. They knew they could not bring anyone back into the bondage of Catholicism as long as true believers clung to the pure text. So the Jesuits plotted to replace our Bible with pro-Catholic readings of Jerome’s Vulgate. This would cause the Protestant scholars to believe our text was unreliable, unreadable and not scholarly. Once programmed, the scholars would attack the pure text, all the while, believing they were doing God’s service.
Next, lets look at the "Jehovah Witnesses" Greek Interliner NT on pages 8 through 9 we read about what text is used to create there corrupt New World Translation.
"The Greek Text : The Greek text that we have used as the basis for the New World Translation is the widely accepted Westcott and Hort text (1881), by reason of its acknowledge excellence. But he have also taken into consideration other texts, including those prepaired by D. Eberhard Nestle, and the spanish Jesuit Scholar Jose Maria Bover, and another Jesuit Scholar, A. Merle. The UBS text of 1975 and the Nestle-Aland text of 1977 were consulted to update the critical apparatus of this edition." (The Forward, The Kingdom Interlinear Translation of the Greek Scriptures, 1985, page 8.)
"In the broad left-hand column of the pages will be found the Greek text edited by B F Westcott and F J a Hort, and published in 1881." (By Way of Explanation, The Kingdom Interlinear Translation of the Greek Scriptures- 1985, page 5.)
The Jehovah's Witnesses used Jesuits and Roman Catholic manuscripts to aid in the translation of the New World Translation.Westcott and Hort took two waste Catholic Sources (the Sinaiticus and the Vaticanus) to produce their waste version of the Bible, Nestle and the New World Translation of the Jehovah's Witnesses, written by Senior Jesuits Jose Maria Bover and A. Merkz, followed Westcott and Hort.
If you have a Bible other then a King James since 1881, then is can be traced back to this corrupt Nestle text and Westcott and Hort text!!!!!!
PART 9 -- The Birdge to Babylon with the The final bible of the Antichrist:
A group out west called the "Jesus Seminar" (which the Jesuits started) which is a group of about 150 individuals, including laymen and scholars along with the American Bible Society want to cut off the book of Revelation (which gives us all our warnings about the Antichrist and the Mark of the Beast and the coming World government) in our Bible and add ===>>
The "Shepherd of Hermas" and "Epistle of Barnabas" in its place. In the "Shepherd of Hermas" it tells you to take a Mark, to give up to the Beast, to take his Name, to form a One World Government and to imprison those who wont go along with there World government for 7 years and to kill those who wont take the Mark! Crazy i know, but please go look it up for your self!!!
Pope John Paul II's June, 1990 speech in San Francisco booms this reprise, "Everything must change. Tolerance is the alpha and omega of a new world order." Frighteningly, the NIV changes the words in Hebrews 9:10 from "until the time of reformation"-KJV to: "until the time of the new order."-NIV
Catholic Church no longer swears by truth of the Bible - Times Online (www.timesonline.co.uk)
THE hierarchy of the Roman Catholic Church has published a teaching document instructing the faithful that some parts of the Bible are not actually true. WOW!
Satan hates the Bible (the KJV)! Check this out from the article: They list a bunch of verses the Catholic Church says are "untrue". Look at what is listed!:
BELIEVE IT OR NOT ... UNTRUE
Revelation xix, 20
"And the beast was captured, and with it the false prophet who in its presence had worked the signs by which he deceived those who had received the mark of the beast and those who worshipped its image. These two were thrown alive into the lake of fire that burns with brimstone.”
I wonder why they would say that verse is untrue!?!?!?!?
God said, "Therefore, behold, I am against the prophets, saith the LORD, that steal my words every one from his neighbour." -- Jeremiah 23:30 God goes on to say, "... for ye have perverted the words of the living God, of the LORD of hosts our God." -- Jeremiah 23:36.
The NIV has 64,098 less words then the KJV. It has removed over 64,000 words! Crazy, whats even more crazy is people still read it and consider it the word of God! Blows my mind, such "doublethink"...Wake up people! The NIV comes from the same corrupt manuscripts as the catholic (b)ibles. And now they have the TNIV which = Todays Negatively Inspired Version! Remember the "TNIV" is a gender neutral bible i.e. a neutered bible!
The generation gap created by new versions of the bible is just what the devil ordered. New Agers agree saying, "It takes a generation or more to escape the old ways." Mystic Robert Muller wrote: "Give me your children and I will give you ...the world." Sounds familiar. Satan and the King of Sodom said the same (Exodus 10:11). The generation which will "worship the Dragon" (Revelation 13:4) will have fallen through the gap which in eternity becomes a "a great gulf fixed" (Luke 16:26). This lost generation is not irreligious-merely worshipping the wrong 'Christ', in the wrong church, with the wrong beliefs-all learned from THE WRONG BIBLE!!!
Most people are probably unaware that Monster Energy drink hails Satan with it's logo. The three lines that seem to make up the letter "M" are actually three Hebrew letter Vav's -- which have a numerical value of 6.
The thing that is most disturbing about all of this is the fact that it is so sublime. It's like THEY are trying to trick you into having these symbols in your possession (LIKE WITH THE NEW BIBLES) -- because they know you wouldn't want it if you knew what it ment. (JUST LIKE THEY DO WITH the new bible PERversions!!!) If Monster starting using the logo below, I'm pretty sure sales would drop.
Now their slogan takes on a slightly different meaning..."UNLEASH THE BEAST"!!
NOW lets look at the ALL NEW IN YOUR FACE "Energy Drink", Which is called "666 Energy Drink":
666 Energy drink is a drink/shot hybrid that comes in two flavors; Virgin Sacrifice Cherry and sugar free Lucifer's Lemonade.
THE ALEXANDRIAN CULT is ALL people who REJECT the FACT of the KJB being "THE" FINAL AUTHORITY; which means their is only "ONE" OBJECTIVE STANDARD OF TRUTH, NOT many! Because these people are afraid of there being an absolute TRUTH that will judge them. That means no loopholes, only conviction. This Cult is people who use and support the new modern PERversions of the (b)ible (NIV, NASV, NKJV, TNIV,... ESV, and all others etc...)! THE ALEXANDRIAN CULT is anyone that doesn't Believe that the KJB is Inherent, Inerrant, Infallible, PERFECT, INSPIRED WORD OF GOD WITHOUT "ERRORS"!
THE CREED OF THE ALEXANDRIAN CULT:
1. There is NO FINAL AUTHORITY but God.
2. Since God is a SPIRIT, there is NO FINAL AUTHORITY that can be seen, heard, read, felt or handled. ...
3. Since all books are MATERIAL, there is NO BOOK ON THIS EARTH THAT IS THE FINAL AND ABSOLUTE AUTHORITY on what is right and what is wrong; what constitutes TRUTH and what constitutes ERROR.
4. There WAS a series of writings one time which, IF they had all been put into a BOOK as soon as they were written the first time, WOULD HAVE constituted an infallible and final authority by which to judge truth and error.
5. However, this series of writings was LOST, and the God Who inspired them was UNABLE TO PRESERVE THEIR CONTENT through Bible-believing Christians at Antioch (Syria), where the first Bible teachers were (Acts 13:1), and where the first missionary trip originated (Acts 13:1-6), and where the word "CHRISTIAN" originated (Acts 11:26).
6. So, God chose to ALMOST preserve them through Gnostics and philosophers from Alexandria, Egypt, even though God called HIS SON OUT of Egypt (Mat. 2), JACOB OUT of Egypt (Gen. 49), ISRAEL OUT of Egypt (Exod. 15), and JOSEPH'S BONES OUT of Egypt (Exod. 13).
7. So, there are two streams of Bibles: the most accurate - though, of course, there is NO FINAL, ABSOLUTE AUTHORITY FOR DETERMINING TRUTH AND ERROR: it is a matter of "preference" - are the Egyptian translations from Alexandria, Egypt, which are "almost the originals," although NOT QUITE.
8. The most INACCURATE TRANSLATIONS were those that brought about the GERMAN REFORMATION (Luther, Zwingli, Boehler, Zinzendorf, Spener, etc.) and the worldwide MISSIONARY MOVEMENT of the English speaking people: the Bible that Sunday, Torrey, Moody, Finney, Spurgeon, Whitfield, Wesley, and Chapman used.
9. But we can "tolerate" these if those who believe in them will tolerate US. After all, since THERE IS NO ABSOLUTE AND FINAL AUTHORITY THAT ANYONE CAN READ, TEACH, PREACH, OR HANDLE, the whole thing is a matter of "PREFERENCE." You may prefer what you prefer, and we will prefer what WE prefer: let us live in peace, and if we cannot agree on anything or everything, let us all agree on one thing: THERE IS NO FINAL, ABSOLUTE, WRITTEN AUTHORITY OF GOD ANYWHERE ON THIS EARTH.
That is the creed of the Alexandrian Cult.^^^
The Alexandrian minds believe the Bible is not perfect and can be improved by their great scholarship, but this is actually a spiritual illness of Egypt (Ex. 15:26). This terrible spiritual illness is called A.I.D.S. (Alexandrian Idiots Degrading Scripture). The Antiochan mentality believes the Bible is perfect and cannot be improved. God promised to preserve His inspired word (Ps. 12:6-7; Jer. 32:36) and the humble mind of the common man simply believes God (1 Thess. 2:13). Faith is simply believing what God says (Isa. 66:2; Acts 27:25; Rom. 10:17; 2 Tim. 2:15; Heb. 11:1-6).
Questions for the KJV Critics:
1. Since you're smart enough to find "mistakes" in the KJV, why don't you correct them all and give us a perfect Bible?
2. Do you have a perfect Bible?
3. Since you do believe "the Bible" is our final authority in all matters of faith and practice, could you please show us where Jesus, Peter, James, Paul, or John ever practiced your terminology ("the Greek text says...the Hebrew text says....the originals say...a better rendering would be....older manuscripts read...." etc.)?
4. Since you do not profess to have a perfect Bible, why do you refer to it as "God's word"?
5. Remembering that the Holy Spirit is the greatest Teacher (John 16:12-15; I John 2:27), who taught you that the King James Bible was not infallible, the Holy Spirit or man?
6. Since you do believe in the degeneration of man and in the degeneration of the world system in general, why is it that you believe education has somehow "evolved" and that men are more qualified to translate God's word today than in 1611?
7. There is one true God, yet many false gods. There is one true Church, consisting of true born-again believers in Christ, yet there are many false churches. So why do you think it's so wrong to teach that there is one true Bible, yet many false "bibles"?
8. Isn't it true that you believe God inspired His holy words in the "originals," but has since lost them, since no one has a perfect Bible today?
9. Isn't it true that when you use the term "the Greek text" you are being deceitful and lying, since there are MANY Greek TEXTS (plural), rather than just one?
10. Before the first new perversion was published in 1881 (the RV), the King James Bible was published, preached, and taught throughout the world. God blessed these efforts and hundreds of millions were saved. Today, with the many new translations on the market, very few are being saved. The great revivals are over. Who has gained the most from the new versions, God or Satan?